The Elect Were NOT Confused

June 9, 2013

, , ,

Download

Over two decades ago, Max King suggested that the reason why the Christians after AD 70 did not mention the Parousia, was because they had been confused by the Hellenizers into misplacing the eschaton. Twenty years ago, Dr. Charles Hill debunked that idea historically. Here in this lesson, we look at some of the biblical evidence which further refutes King's Hellenization theory, to show that an actual rapture of the Elect saints is the best explanation for the silence of the Christians about the Parousia after AD 70. If you wish to have the PDF lesson outline that is available for this podcast, simply email us to request it (preterist1@preterist.org). Be sure to mention the date of the podcast for which you would like to receive the PDF.

Support the show

Similar Posts

Laodicea and Smyrna

Historical Fulfillments Episodes, Podcast

Futurists use the historical situation of Laodicea and Smyrna to suggest that Revelation could not have been written before AD 70. We will show how they have misinterpreted both Scripture and History, and that history and archaeology both show that these churches were alive and well at the time John wrote Revelation in AD 62….

Cestius Gallus Fiasco (AD 66)

Historical Fulfillments Episodes, Podcast

We look at the early months of the Jewish rebellion (August through December AD 66). We notice how the Zealots quickly organized their government and prepared for the Roman attack. The Roman Legate in Antioch, Cestius Gallus, did not waste any time responding to the rebellion, but his attack on Jerusalem was mismanaged from start…

Barnabas (more)

Historical Fulfillments Episodes, Podcast

Why God has arranged for America to endure four more years under Obama, and how Christians should live in response to it. Discusses more of the biblical narrative about Barnabas and Mark, to suggest when the Epistle of Barnabas might have been written, as well as when Barnabas died, and Mark joined Paul in Rome….